|
BWMA - campaigning for inch-pound industries
and consumer interests
Home
News in
brief
Consumer Affairs
Business Issues
The Political
Front The Legal
Campaign
Metric Transport and Signs
International
Trade
Join the Action
Metric Culprits
Discussion Forums |
Direct Action
against Illegal metric signs
BWMA is pleased to
report the formation of direct action group Active Resistance to
Metrication (ARM). Active Resistance to Metrication shares the same goals
as BWMA but employs direct methods owing to the failure of many local
authorities to replace or remove illegal metric traffic signs. ARM ("give the
foot a hand") has supplied BWMA with photographs of its actions;
please click here for the Photopage.
| Photographs featured on this page are the property of Active
Resistance to Metrication. Permission to reproduce them must be sought from its
chairman Anthony Bennett (click here for email). |
| The ARM team
in their trademark yellow jackets and helmets |
 |
What is Direct
Action?
Public
officials and representatives derive their authority from the people through
Parliament. At no point have the people through Parliament given authority for
local councils to set up metric traffic signs. Councils that set up metric
traffic signs defy the people and Parliament.
"Direct action" can be seen as the
following: action by members of the public who take their authority
direct from the law and Parliament in order to apply the said law.
|
|
Direct Action
and the Law
Active
Resistance to Metrication believes that direct action against metric signs is
lawful under Section 131 of the 1980 Highways Act:
| "If a person
without lawful authority or excuse pulls down or obliterates a traffic sign
placed on or over the highway - he is guilty of an offence; but it is a defence
in any proceedings under this subsection to show that the traffic sign was not
lawfully placed". |
ARM believes that the above passage, making physical action
again unlawful signs a minor, non-criminal offence, protects members of the
public from criminal prosecution. For a full awareness of the legal issues and
the 2002 court case, please follow
this link. For further
information on Active Resistance to Metrication, please contact BWMA's liaison
officer Derek Norman, telephone 01480 435837, email
rebeldel@waitrose.com |
Examples of Direct Action
"Blacking out" illegality
The
most elementary means of direct action is to cover over illegal metric
indications with adhesive tape. By placing the tape over unauthorised metric
terms, the sign becomes "legal". The sign is not damaged and no other
information is obscured. The sign is then reported to the local
council.
| An
example of illegality covered over |
 |
Temporary conversion
The sign below was an illegal "fingerpost" sign in Edmonton, north London. The
sign was converted to legal units in August 2001. Direct action activists made
a note of the metric distances, then wrapped parcel tape around the illegal
elements, thereby removing them from public view. Using an indelible marker
pen, they then wrote in the distances in legal
units.
| A converted
sign |
 |
Fingerpost signs -
National De-metrication Programme
Active Resistance
to Metrication has launched a nationwide "de-metrication" programme of illegal
pedestrian signs where local authorities have been negligent in applying the
law. The images below demonstrate how Active Resistance converts the signs to
legal status.
| The sign before
legalisation |
|
 |
Preparing the legal distance plates
 |
| |
|
Applying glue
 |
Fixing the plates to the sign
 |
|
|
| The corrected signs, before... |
and
after |
| |
|
300m
 |
330 yd
 |
| |
|
800m
 |
½ mile
 |
| |
|
Physical return of illegal signs to local
authorities
Another tactic employed by Active Resistance is to remove unlawful
signs from the streets and return them to their owners, the local councils,
with a request that they replace the signs with lawful equivalents.
| Unlawful
sign |
|
Lawful
sign |
 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| Active
Resistance to Metrication returns illegal metric signs to local Council for
replacement |
 |
| |
|